Skip to main content
Select a language to translate this page
Link to the CAST store
Search

UDL-CIC Domain Two: Teaching and Learning

In higher education settings that apply the UDL framework, faculty and staff design learning opportunities that anticipate learner variability and help every learner build agency. In Domain Two of the UDL-CIC, the CAST UDL Guidelines are used proactively and iteratively to shape course goals, assessments, methods, and materials while reducing barriers to learning. An institution aligned with the UDL-CIC views every interaction as a learning opportunity and designs it with inclusive UDL principles in mind.

Element 1:
Learning goals viewed through a UDL lens go beyond stating what learners should know; they also clarify how learners will engage with learning. UDL-aligned goals make the “what” and “why” clear to learners.

Intent

To ensure all learning experiences are goal-driven and support learning for all. Clear goals reflect the purpose behind the learning experiences, which in turn helps guide the design of teaching plans and practices that engage learners. They allow faculty and staff to align course assessments, methods, and materials effectively. Learners are empowered to make meaningful choices that support their strengths and needs, encouraging them to take ownership and agency of their learning. Clear goals set achievable expectations for all and should be separate from the means required to achieve them, when possible.

Indicators

In higher education organizations, learning goals are designed to be:

  • clearly defined;
  • communicated in ways that are accessible, perceivable, and understandable, and can be expressed by learners;
  • separated from the means to achieve them, which allows multiple paths to achievement; and
  • expressed in ways that highlight their relevance to learners.

Element 2:
Flexible assessment methods are used to support learner variability and reduce barriers to learning.

Intent

To ensure all learners gain the intended skills, habits, and knowledge from learning experiences. Course formative assessments are intentionally designed to align with and measure the intended goals. They are integrated throughout the learning experience and are designed to anticipate learner variability and reduce barriers to learning. Flexible assessments inform instruction and support the development of goal-oriented learners.

Assessments are intentionally designed using the UDL Guidelines to be:

  • flexible and include optional ways for learners to demonstrate competency;
  • aligned to intended learning goals;
  • accessible to all learners; and
  • used to inform future instructions.

Element 3:
The syllabus is a foundational document in higher education courses that serves as a roadmap for learning. When designed with UDL principles in mind, it becomes a powerful tool for creating inclusive and accessible learning environments.

Intent

As we strive to provide the best possible course for our learners, we must consider the diverse learning needs in our classrooms. The syllabus serves as a roadmap by providing a glimpse into the forthcoming learning environment. It presents a unique opportunity for instructors to establish the class atmosphere, articulate precise learning objectives, and address matters of accessibility and available options.

Overall, a syllabus is a critical tool for effective teaching and learning. It helps create a structured and organized learning environment, ensuring that both instructors and learners are equally informed regarding course content and expectations.

Indicators

Universal Design for Learning offers the foundation for creating syllabi that foster an inclusive learning environment where all learners feel valued and supported. Promotion of learner success can be provided by the following flexible and accessible pathways to learning:

  • Inclusive and accessible language
  • Multiple methods of communication
  • Clear expectations and assessment methods
  • Learner empowerment

Element 4:
Opportunities for learning promote expectations and beliefs that optimize motivation and facilitate personal coping skills and strategies.

Intent

To ensure all learners recognize within themselves, of and with others, the synergetic relationship amongst an intelligence quotient and emotional quotient. The role of social emotional learning in higher education has intentionality in nurturing the development of self-esteem, encouraging agency in learning, supporting the development of cognitive outcomes, and fostering well-being. By integrating emotion throughout the learning experience, positive outcomes for self and others as well as an improved learning environment occur.

Indicators

Learners in higher education, whether through direct or indirect means, have the opportunity to achieve desired outcomes through social emotional learning. They:

  • identify as a member of the community;
  • engage in activities that foster academic and social development and social emotional well-being;
  • efficiently self-regulate;
  • utilize cognitive resources effectively; and
  • contribute ongoing feedback on their experiences and learning needs.

Element 5:
Digital learning spaces are used for face-to-face, HyFlex, synchronous, and asynchronous learning sessions. These spaces include materials and activities that learners can retrieve from their devices. When intentionally designed, digital learning spaces can be accessible and engaging with UDL in action. Equally important is the physical environment in which digital learning occurs – whether in a classroom, at home, or on the go.

Intent

The intent for digital learning in higher education is to leverage technology to create engaging digital learning environments that proactively addresses learner variability for face-to-face and online sessions. Physical space should support learners’ ability to access, engage with, and respond to digital content by considering factors like lighting, seating, device setup, and sensory needs.

Indicators

What are the intentional points designed using the UDL Guidelines?

  • Planning a digital learning environment
  • Thoughtful integration of physical and digital space to enhance equity, comfort, and focus for all learners
  • Consideration for instructional planning
  • Consideration for executive functioning
  • Supports for executive functioning in a digital learning environment

Element 6:
Case-Based learning presents real-world scenarios for learners to analyze and solve. Universal Design for Learning provides multiple ways to access information and engage with the case to ensure all learners can actively participate in the learning process and develop critical thinking skills.

Intent

Our intent for case-based learning in higher education is to leverage real-world scenarios to ignite learner interest across disciplines. This approach fosters critical thinking and collaboration, empowering every learner in our diverse educational landscape. By embracing Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles, we can ensure this powerful pedagogy reaches, assesses, and empowers all learners.

Indicators

What are intentional points of case-based learning design using the UDL Guidelines?

  • Spark diverse learners’ curiosity and motivation
  • Present cases in accessible formats
  • Empower learners to analyze, debate, and solve cases

Element 7:
Faculty and staff have the opportunity to increase effective instructional environments through the iterative relationship between data analysis and course design.

Intent

Interpretation of data through a lens of the UDL Principles informs effective instructional environments and engages all learner variability with opportunities to reduce learner stress and increase learner voice. When triangulating demographic data, usage data and achievement data, a systems approach to data analysis offers a complimentary lens to individual or subgroups of learner data. For example, learning Management Systems (LMSs) are popular for housing course content and information yet often overlooked as a source of data in instructional design decision making.

Indicators

The UDL Guidelines emphasize data analytics that include:

  • Emphasis on data visualizations that focus on the learning environment
  • Interpretation of data through the UDL principles
  • Taking a positive improvement approach in use of data for change in practice
  • Bridging data analysis and course design via learner voice

UDL-CIC Levels: Continuum of Practice

Key Characteristics

  • UDL practices initiated by some faculty/staff
  • Early phase of implementation across physical and/or digital spaces

Data Practices

  • Collect and analyze baseline or early data on:
    • Goal design
    • Alignment between goals and assessments
    • Alignment of methods/materials with UDL framework
  • Monitor learner progress
  • Revise instruction using UDL and data
  • Incorporate learner voice to shape inclusive environments

Faculty Actions

  • Some faculty/staff analyze and share learner outcome data
  • Early-stage curriculum/course design includes UDL considerations for academic and social-emotional development

Communication

  • Use inclusive, accessible, non-stigmatizing language in syllabi and materials
  • Learning goals, assessments, expectations, and requirements clearly outlined in syllabi and LMS
  • Contact information and one method of communication offered

Support Systems

  • Support teams begin to implement a plan to assist faculty/staff in designing UDL
    -aligned goals, assessments, and instruction
  • Effectiveness of support is monitored
  • Plan is revised as needed based on early feedback and data

Key Characteristics

  • Intermediate UDL implementation
  • ≥50% of faculty/staff demonstrating UDL-aligned practices
  • Builds on Level 1 accomplishments

Data Practices

  • Collect, analyze, and use continuous data to refine:
    • Goal alignment with indicators
    • Assessment alignment
    • Instructional methods/materials informed by data and UDL
  • Data monitors learner progress and environment to adjust experiences
  • Revisions to goals, assessments, materials guided by learner input and UDL

Faculty Actions

  • Periodic sharing of data on learner progress and learning environment
  • Use data to evaluate effectiveness of support plans for faculty/staff

Communication

  • Inclusive, accessible, and non-stigmatizing language used and modeled
  • Multiple contact methods clearly provided and maintained
  • Clear communication of goals, expectations, and assessments via syllabus/LMS

Support Systems

  • Collaborative team implements and monitors UDL-aligned support plan for faculty
  • Plan revised based on data
  • Goals, assessments, and instruction iteratively designed

Community of Practice

  • Engages with external UDL networks and other institutions to enhance and sustain implementation

Key Characteristics

  • Advanced UDL implementation
  • Meets Levels 1 & 2 criteria
  • Majority of faculty/staff demonstrate sustained UDL-aligned practices

Data Practices

  • Continuous collection and use of data to demonstrate impact on learner progress
  • Alignment across goals, assessments, and methods/materials
  • Adjustments informed by data and learner input
  • Ongoing revisions based on learner voice and experiences

Faculty Actions

  • Faculty/staff frequently share data analyses on learner progress and environment
  • Assess and refine plans supporting faculty in UDL-aligned design and delivery

Communication

  • Consistent modeling of inclusive, non-stigmatizing language
  • Learner-friendly, multimodal communication options shared via syllabus, LMS, and materials
  • Clear, inclusive modeling of learning goals, expectations, and assessments

Support Systems

  • Collaborative team continuously improves the faculty/staff support plan
  • Regularly monitors and revises based on data and faculty/staff feedback
  • Encourages input from faculty/staff to improve support infrastructure

Community of Practice

  • Institution mentors and supports other higher ed organizations and the broader UDL community to scale implementation

Key Characteristics

  • Highest level of UDL innovation and implementation
  • Meets all Level 1–3 criteria
  • Campus-wide culture shift—nearly all faculty/staff demonstrate UDL-aligned practices

Data Practices

  • Systematic collection and use of data to demonstrate long-term learner progress
  • Full alignment: goals ↔ indicators, assessments ↔ goals, methods/materials ↔ all of the above
  • Curriculum continuously elevates academic and social-emotional development
  • Learner voice drives co-construction and redesign of learning spaces

Faculty Actions

  • Faculty/staff regularly share data analyses on learner progress and UDL impact
  • Regularly review and improve support plans to enhance alignment with learner needs and the UDL framework

Communication

  • Faculty/staff model inclusive language and avoid stigmatizing terms
  • Learners co-construct communication norms and goals, assessments, and course expectations
  • Multiple inclusive communication pathways are co-designed with learners

Support Systems

  • Support teams continuously iterate and improve support plans
  • Effectiveness is monitored with data and stakeholder input
  • Revisions are made flexibly based on faculty/staff feedback and learner needs

Community of Practice

  • Institution mentors others across higher education and the broader UDL community
  • Actively contributes to advancing and sustaining inclusive education practices

To assess progress within each level of the continuum, consider the following dimensions of equitable weight:

Accessible Learning Spaces:

  • Design of learning spaces that support variability.
  • Accessibility of physical and digital spaces.
  • Integration of technology to enhance learning experiences.

Communication:

  • Build strong communication channels between instructors and students.
  • Include feedback loops, open office hours for Q&A and Graduate Assistants’ tutoring sessions.
  • Use of platforms for continuous interaction.

Equitable Practices:

  • Use of data to monitor progress.
  • Intentional design of procedures and processes to promote learner progress, UDL implementation, as well as faculty and staff support.
  • Actively fostering a sense of learning community.

Inclusive Culture:

  • Establish a learning environment where all students feel valued and respected.

Learner Empowerment:

  • Co-creation of an inclusive and equitable learning experience.
  • Commitment to promoting agentic learning.
  • Multidimensional learning experience.

Data Collection: Gather quantitative and qualitative data to assess progress along the continuum, including learner feedback and outcomes.

Collective/Self-Assessment: Use surveys, interviews, and observations to gather feedback from faculty, staff, and learners.