Classroom Strategies
Armstrong, T. (2000). Information transformation: Teaching strategies for
authentic research, projects, and activities. Ontario, Canada: Pembroke
Publishers
Eagleton, M. B. & Guinee, K. (2002). Strategies for supporting student
Internet inquiry. New England Reading Association Journal, 38(2), 39-47.
Eagleton, M. B., Guinee, K., & Langlais, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy
strategies: The hero inquiry project. Voices from the Middle, 10(3),
28-35.
Leu, D. J., Jr., Leu, D. D., & Coiro, J. (2004). Teaching with the Internet
K-12: New literacies for new times. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Rankin, V. (1999). The thoughtful researcher: Teaching the research process
to middle school students. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Short, K. G., & Harste, J. C. (1996). Creating classrooms for authors
and inquirers (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Inquiry Process Models
Barron, A., & Ivers, K. (1996). An Internet research model. Proceedings
of the National Educational Computing Conference, Minneapolis, MN. Eric
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 880.
Eisenberg, M, & Berkowitz, B. (2001). Big6: An Information Problem-Solving
Process. Retrieved April 7, 2004, from: http://www.big6.com
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Teaching the library research process. Metuchen,
NJ: Scarecrow Press.
McKenzie, J. (1999). The research cycle. From Now On: The Educational Technology
Journal, 6(4). Retrieved April 7, 2004 from http://questioning.org/rcycle.html
Stimson, M. (1995). Info Zone Research Skills. Retrieved online April
7, 2004, from http://www.assd.winnipeg.mb.ca/infozone
Stripling, B., & Pitts, J. (1988). Brainstorms and blueprints: Teaching
research as a thinking process. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Tepe, A., & Pappas, M. (1998). Follett information skills model.
Retrieved online April 7, 2004, from http://eduscapes.com/info/pathways.html
Research on Internet Searching
Bilal, D. (2002). Perspectives on children's navigation of the World Wide Web:
Does the type of search task make a difference? Online Information Review,
26(2), 108-17.
Dennis, S., Bruza, P., & McArthur, R. (2002). Web searching: A process-oriented
experimental study of three interactive search paradigms. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 120-133.
Guinee, K., Eagleton, M. B., & Hall, T. (2003). Adolescents' Internet search
strategies: Drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic
information sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3),
363-374.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's
online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved online April 26, 2004, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html
Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning
from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research & Development,
45(4), 37-64.
Jansen, B. J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of Web searching studies and
a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 52(3), 235-246.
Moukdad, H., & Large, A. (2001). Users' perceptions of the Web as revealed
by transaction log analysis. Online Information Review, 25(6), 349-358.
Theoretical Readings
Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext and the history
of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding
of reading comprehension to encompass the new literacies demanded in Web-based
learning environments. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
Hill, J. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking
in open ended information systems. Educational Technology Research and Development,
47(1), 5-27.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical
thinking (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge
and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory
of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other ICT. In R. Ruddell and
Norman Unrau (Eds.) Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.).
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in
cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L., & Keiffer, R. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook
of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Universal Design for Learning
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002, November/December).
Providing access to the general education curriculum: Universal Design for Learning.
Teaching Exceptional Children, 35 (2), 8-17.
Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (1998). Learning to read in the computer age.
Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Meyer, A., O'Neill, L. (2000). Beyond access: Universal Design for Learning.
Exceptional Parent, 30 (3), 59-61.
O'Neill, L. (2001). Universal Design for Learning. Syllabus, April,
31-32.
Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of Universal
Design for Learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22 (4), 197-203.
Rose, D. H., & Dolan, R. P. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal
of Special Education Technology, 15 (4). Retrieved online May 11, 2004,
from http://jset.unlv.edu/15.4/asseds/rose.html
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for individual differences.
Educational Leadership, 58 (3), 39-43.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital
Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Rose, D. H., Sethuraman, S., & Meo, G. (2000). Universal Design for Learning.
Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (2), 56-60.
Search Tools
Web Search Tutorials
Software Tools
